Congrats Malgorzata!, You are a double exposure technique master! Superb job! Love your gallery and your photography vision.
Dear Friends! Thank you very much for all your comments and plusses. PLEASE see the link below. This information should help you understand better my photograph that was taken in double exposure technique. NOTHING WAS PHOTOSHOPED. The landscape was created by combining (IN THE CAMERA) two shots in one. Please also visit my profile on Your Shot (just click on my name above)where you will have a chance to see some more of my double exposure shots, including Daily Dozens from 2008 & 2014. National Geographic has the best photographers and experts in the world - they would not accept manipulated photograph.
Gratuluję wyróżnienia! To zdjęcie zasługuje...:))) Dużo się tu napracowano chyba przy składaniu kilku zdjęć(ale mogę się mylić,za co przepraszam z góry),ale efekt zaskakujący.Pozdrawiam
Shocking that my untrained eye knew within seconds that something was wrong with this photo; the reflection doesn't fit. Thanks to Dave Milliken's comment below I saw that the front row of trees was just enlarged and put into the background, just check out how they match, branch for branch. Having a photoshopped POD makes me wonder what Your Shot's editors were thinking.
I'm not an artist or photographer but I am disappointed that this was photoshopped. I can see it with my untrained eye. :/ I want to see nature NATURALLY. (With a camera, of course. Heehee)
One of the most obvious Photoshopped photos I've seen. I can see why it was done, to create a nice arc in the pond. But so obvious. You guys should have caught this.
FAKE Photoshop Edit !
That's actually ridiculous. I mean choosing one image per day can't be that hard of a job for an editor to not recognize such a composition. But obviously it is. I could understand that happening for the DD but not for image of the day were you have weeks before the actual image is published. And I also think that the owner of the image should have set things straight and not fooling people in order to get some publicity. Thats a bad job.
I would have preferred it without the photoshopping. The hazier backline of trees is a larger copy of the frontline. You can tell if you take a close look at the branch patterns. This is the first time I've seen a photoshopped picture on NG!
Subscribe to National Geographic magazine and save. Print and digital editions available for as little as $12.